If an agreement cannot be reached in relation to an overall financial settlement between the parties during divorce proceedings and an application is made to the court, then the procedure and timetable for determination of the financial remedy application will be imposed by the court.
The preliminary matters to be considered and the court procedure is set out below:
1. Overriding objective
The courts are required to ensure that all financial remedy cases are conducted in such a way that justice is promoted, that the resources of the courts are used appropriately and that cases are conducted proportionately. A judge determining the case will consider both parties’ income and capital “needs” and also look at the overall fairness of any order he or she may make.
2. Jurisdiction of the court
A spouse cannot initiate the process which will lead ultimately to an overall financial remedy order, without divorce proceedings having first been issued. A couple may, of course, reach an agreement at any time and agree to implement it, but it is only the issuing of a divorce petition, which gives a judge the jurisdiction to consider an application and make the appropriate order. Furthermore, the judge cannot make a final order dealing with, for example, capital, the home and other property, or make a pension sharing order, until the decree nisi of divorce (the penultimate stage in the divorce suit) has been pronounced. In addition, unless agreed otherwise by the parties themselves, an order dealing with lump sum provision, capital, property, pension sharing and certain trust assets once made, cannot be implemented until the decree absolute terminating the marriage has been pronounced.
3. Information gathering and pre-action protocol
There is a pre-action protocol requiring the parties to provide each other with full and frank financial disclosure (information and documentation) to enable negotiations to start at an early stage in the financial remedy proceedings. It is also important that the parties obtain pension information at the earliest opportunity, as it can take some pension providers a considerable time to produce the required information. This is particularly true of some public sector pensions, such as NHS and Teacher pension funds.
If either the petitioner or the respondent to the divorce proceedings wishes to start financial remedy proceedings, the procedure is as follows:
- An application by a spouse for financial provision is issued with the court office, using Form A.
- When a financial remedy application is filed (the relevant court fee is £275, as of May 2022), the court office will allocate a 30-minute appointment with a district judge on the next available date, approximately 12 to 16 weeks ahead. This date of the First Directions Appointment (the “FDA” hearing) cannot be changed without very good reason and only with the permission of a district judge.
- The application Form A is served upon the other party within 4 days of it being issued by the court. The applicant’s solicitors may choose to serve the respondent themselves if they think he or she may seek to avoid service. Pension companies and mortgagees must also be served. A certificate of service upon pension and mortgage companies should be filed at the court and served on the other party.
- The Form A is accompanied by a Notice of Proceedings form which confirms the date of the FDA hearing before a district judge, as well as the dates by which certain other directions must be complied with by the parties.
- Each side must then complete and sign a Financial Statement, known as a Form E. The Form E includes details of the parties and their children, their financial means including pension provision, their capital and income needs, details of their standard of living prior to the breakdown of the marriage, the contributions (financial and non-financial) made by them to the marriage and any other relevant information which may assist the court. The Form E also instructs the parties which documents should accompany the document. For example, the documents include the following:
- A party’s last 3 payslips;
- their last P60 (and last P11D if applicable);
- up to date valuations of all properties;
- the most recent mortgage statement for each property;
- the last 12 months statements for every bank account in which a party has an interest;
- the surrender valuation for any insurance policy;
- the last two years' accounts for any partnership and/or business, together with any documentation which confirms the estimate of the current value of the business;
- up to date pension valuation documentation (considerable detail required by regulations);
- the latest statement or dividend counterfoil relating to each investment;
- if a party is self-employed, a copy of their tax assessment (or letter from their accountant confirming their tax liability) and in some circumstances a copy of management accounts for the period since the last accounts;
- any other document necessary to confirm and/or clarify any figures inserted in the Form E.
Once the Form E has been completed, it must be signed.
- The Form E has to be filed with the court and a copy exchanged simultaneously with a copy of the Form E signed by the other party and by the date set by the court. The pension companies may request a copy of the Form E.
- In the 4 weeks following the filing and exchange of Form E, each party must consider what additional information and documents they require of the other and prepare and serve a questionnaire seeking replies to the questionnaire. They must also prepare a concise statement of the issues in the case they will the judge to determine, and a chronology of the major events. These documents have to be exchanged with the other party. The due date is set out in the court’s notice mentioned at paragraph 5 above.
- These three documents, that is the questionnaire, the chronology and the statement of issues must be filed with the court and served on the other side at least 14 days before the FDA hearing. At this stage also, if there has been no response from the other party, formal confirmation of service of Form A has to be provided to the court. The parties must also decide if the FDA hearing is needed to obtain directions from the court, in relation to the filing of evidence, or whether it is possible to use the allocated time to have the hearing proceed as a Financial Dispute Resolution appointment (the “FDR” hearing) instead.
- Immediately prior to the FDA hearing, each side must produce a written estimate of the costs incurred by them up to the date of the hearing and their estimated costs up to the FDR hearing, if their case does not settle at the FDA stage, on a form known as a Form H. The costs estimate must not include work in connection with the divorce proceedings, arrangements for the children or any protective injunction orders, i.e. only costs incurred in relation to financial negotiations are included in the Form H.
- If one party wishes to apply for immediate assessment of their costs of the FDA hearing, e.g. if the other party has not completed a Form E or sought to deliberately delay matters progressing, and they seek a costs order for payment of their costs by the other party, a detailed assessment schedule of costs in a specific format must be served 24 hours before the hearing.
The First Directions Appointment (the “FDA”):
The purpose of the FDA hearing is to seek to limit the issues to those, which are strictly relevant and thus to save costs. A district judge will consider the statements of issues to be determined and attempt to narrow them. The judge will also consider (and if necessary, order) which of the questions in the parties’ questionnaires should be answered and what documents, if any, will need to be produced by one or both parties.
The district judge will also consider what expert evidence and valuations are required and make orders for these to be produced. Expert evidence is usually obtained at the parties' joint expense.
The district judge will also consider what other evidence, whether by statements, chronologies, or schedules, may be required. The pension company may also be represented at the FDA hearing, although this is unusual. The district judge will then arrange for a further court hearing to be listed. This second hearing is a Financial Dispute Resolution ("FDR") hearing. Occasionally, it may be a further "directions" appointment to consider what other information is outstanding and which may be required before the FDR hearing can be effective.
If appropriate to do so, the district judge may also provide for there to be a hearing to consider interim matters, such as interim maintenance, or exceptionally, for a Final Hearing to take place without an FDR hearing taking place first. If appropriate, the case may be referred to mediation. The district judge may also make a costs order at this stage if he or she considers, for example, that one party has failed to follow the financial remedy proceedings’ procedure (usually in bad faith).
Future conduct of the case:
As mentioned above, the district judge at the FDA hearing, will direct a timetable for the production of additional documents and information, which must be complied with. No further information, documentation or evidence without the permission of the court.
The court office will give notice to the parties of when and where the FDR hearing (or further directions) hearing will take place. If it is to be an FDR, at least 7 days prior to that FDR, each side have to inform the court of all offers that have been made to settle the case and the responses to those offers.
Immediately prior to the FDR, both sides must produce further costs estimates on Forms H. It is sensible to seek the approval of pension companies and/or mortgage companies to a proposed order (such as a pension sharing order or transfer of a property) before the court is invited to make such an order.
The Financial Dispute Resolution Hearing (the “FDR” hearing):
The objective of the Financial Dispute Resolution hearing is to attempt to reach an agreement to settle the case. The parties and their legal advisors are required to attend court at least an hour before the commencement of the hearing for discussions. The discussions are "legally privileged" or “without prejudice” which means that they cannot be referred to at any subsequent hearing if the FDR hearing is unsuccessful. The exception to this rule is any non-privileged offers (i.e. open offers), which have been made before the FDR hearing.
The district judge at the FDR hearing will be invited by the parties’ legal representatives to give his or her recommendation/ indication, of what he or she thinks is a fair overall settlement. Their indication is an opportunity for the parties to realise what order a future judge may consider appropriate at a final hearing and whether or not their position is a reasonable one to adopt. However, the judge’s indication is not binding.
At the conclusion of the hearing, any documents containing reference to without prejudice offers must be removed from the court file and returned to the parties.
The district judge has the power to adjourn the FDR hearing, to make a final order by agreement, to give further directions for the case to be dealt with at a Final Hearing, to fix a final hearing date, or to make what other directions may be considered appropriate.
If the FDR hearing is unsuccessful, the judge will make directions orders, in relation to what further evidence must be filed before the final hearing.
The court will also notify the parties through their solicitors of the final hearing date (if not given at the conclusion of the FDR hearing).
Prior to the final hearing, both parties are obliged to draft a statement (known as a Section 25 Statement) of the main points they wish to rely upon in evidence and to set out their open proposals to settle the case. The applicant must file their proposal with the court and serve it on the other party at least 14 days before the Final Hearing. The respondent must respond within 7 days after receipt of that offer, with their own open proposals.
The applicant must then prepare and agree with the respondent, a summary of the background of the case, a chronology, a schedule of the assets, liabilities, incomes and outgoings and a paginated bundle of documents for use at the final hearing. Both parties’ legal representatives will also prepare and file at court immediately before the final hearing, position statements setting out their client’s arguments in support of the orders sought by them at the final hearing.
The final hearing:
Once again each party must file and serve a costs estimate (on Form H1) prior to the final hearing. This cost estimate however is more detailed than the costs estimates produced for the FDA and FDR hearings.
At the Final Hearing, both parties will give oral evidence and submit themselves to cross-examination. Expert witnesses who have been directed to attend will also give evidence (unless their written evidence is accepted by both parties prior to the final hearing). The judge will also consider the relevant documents in the court bundle. Both parties’ legal representatives will make brief submissions on behalf of their respective clients, at the conclusion of the evidence giving.
The judge will then give a summing up of the evidence before giving their decision. However, a judge may give their decision later (known as a "reserved judgment"). Once the judgement has been handed down, each side may then address the issue of costs, so that the judge can determine whether or not either party has behaved in such a way during the proceedings to warrant having a costs order made against them. However, such orders are rare in financial remedy proceedings and the usual rule is that each party pays their own costs.
Once the judge’s final order has been made, it is typed by the court office (or drafted by the parties’ legal representatives and approved by the judge) and served on the parties’ legal representatives by the court office, so implementation of the order can commence. Should an appeal be advised, (assuming there are proper legal grounds to justify an appeal, rather than just general dissatisfaction with the outcome of the hearing), notice of appeal has to be lodged within 14 days. Because of the judge’s wide discretion, successful appeals are not common.
This information sheet has been prepared to highlight some key issues relating to financial provision on divorce. It is intended to be for general guidance only and is not a substitute for specific advice. It is based upon our understanding of the legal position as of May 2022 and may be affected by subsequent changes in the law.
Have we answered all your questions about the financial provision for divorce? If not, get in touch with our highly experienced team of family solicitors, or contact your nearest Goodlaw branch. Our Sussex team can be reached on 01273 956 270 and our Surrey team on 01252 471 211.
Read our other guides on marriage and divorce: